Post by Gina on Mar 3, 2013 14:31:26 GMT -6
soooooo
the way i see it is this.
Scenario #1: Patty wins immunity. Takes me to the finals. easy. done. She'd have a hard jury case if she turns on her alliance this late in the game, when she's played such a good game herself, it'd look super bad if she didn't take me.
Scenario #2: John wins immunity. He takes me to the finals. easy right? RIGHT. The way both of them have been talking lead me to believe that neither of them think that i'm a threat, which has been my strategy the WHOLE time. Win one challenge, maybe two, so i don't look TOO pathetic, ride a couple coattails, stay loyal to a powerful player (was sarah, now patty) but stay in contact with everyone and play a superior social game (plus the playing dumb card helps A LOT). anyways....john will take me too. he has no chance against patty cuz he's such a douchebag, but against me, he can play the "last rotu standing" card much more effectively.
Scenario #3: I win immunity.
This one is tricky, though.
If I take Patty, I can only really argue that she's only won challenges and has played an ultra-belligerent social game, whereas I've been lower profile, have always had a clear side that I was on, but kept it on the DL enough where everyone would still volunteer me info.
If I take John, in any other case I think I would have a better chance at winning, except for the fact that I would have to betray Patty to get to that point, which I really don't think would help me jury-wise....I, personally feel I've played a fantastic, under-the-radar quasi-double agent game....but I feel like my strategems are far less obvious to all of my victims sitting on the jury.
ahdfhajdkafhekjfha tbh i feel like i'm playing for second at this point.
the way i see it is this.
Scenario #1: Patty wins immunity. Takes me to the finals. easy. done. She'd have a hard jury case if she turns on her alliance this late in the game, when she's played such a good game herself, it'd look super bad if she didn't take me.
Scenario #2: John wins immunity. He takes me to the finals. easy right? RIGHT. The way both of them have been talking lead me to believe that neither of them think that i'm a threat, which has been my strategy the WHOLE time. Win one challenge, maybe two, so i don't look TOO pathetic, ride a couple coattails, stay loyal to a powerful player (was sarah, now patty) but stay in contact with everyone and play a superior social game (plus the playing dumb card helps A LOT). anyways....john will take me too. he has no chance against patty cuz he's such a douchebag, but against me, he can play the "last rotu standing" card much more effectively.
Scenario #3: I win immunity.
This one is tricky, though.
If I take Patty, I can only really argue that she's only won challenges and has played an ultra-belligerent social game, whereas I've been lower profile, have always had a clear side that I was on, but kept it on the DL enough where everyone would still volunteer me info.
If I take John, in any other case I think I would have a better chance at winning, except for the fact that I would have to betray Patty to get to that point, which I really don't think would help me jury-wise....I, personally feel I've played a fantastic, under-the-radar quasi-double agent game....but I feel like my strategems are far less obvious to all of my victims sitting on the jury.
ahdfhajdkafhekjfha tbh i feel like i'm playing for second at this point.
